We help leaders and people in an organization name values that match their true identity and translate them into concrete behaviors, decision-making, and daily habits. The facilitated process creates a common cultural language that can support collaboration, trust, leadership, and more understandable personnel decisions.
Values can be an important guiding principle for an organization. However, a list of words alone is not enough. People need to know how values manifest themselves in team leadership, decision-making, collaboration, conflict resolution, and challenging personnel situations.
Facilitation creates a space to name the current culture, capture different experiences, and find a common language. What is important is the consistency between what the organization declares, what its systems support, and what people see every day in the behavior of authorities.
What is characteristic of the company, what does it want to preserve and in what direction does it want to develop?
Trust, communication, conflicts and mutual responsibility
Recruitment, onboarding, development, evaluation, compensation and departures
Repeated practices that maintain and commemorate culture
Compliance of internal reality with what the company communicates externally
The process may involve founders, management, HR, people leaders, selected teams, or a representative group of employees. The scope will be adjusted to the size of the organization and its stage of development.
The organization needs to consciously name what it wants to preserve even as people and teams grow.
A new direction needs a common language that respects past experience and names change.
Different work cultures need space for understanding and common rules of cooperation
Values exist, but people don't know how to connect them to behavior, decisions, or HR practices
Management needs to name what needs to change so that the strategy has real organizational support.
Employer branding should be based on authentic internal experience, not unsubstantiated promises
Value is created when an organization can name common principles, explain their practical meaning, and create the conditions in which decisions can be made based on them.
Understandable names for the behaviors the company wants to encourage
Values translated into examples, questions and boundaries
More visible places where systems or authorities contradict values
Space to understand different experiences and create agreement
Linking values to recruitment, onboarding, development and leadership
Internal culture as a basis for employer branding and reputation
The specific set of deliverables will be agreed upon based on the goal, number of roles, and level of detail. Not every collaboration requires all of the above components.
Typical behaviors, strengths, tensions, informal rules, and cultural paradoxes
Clearly named values with an explanation of their meaning for a specific organization
A document linking company identity, values, expected behavior, and decision-making principles
Specific examples, boundaries and situations in which values can be recognized
Recommendations for meetings, onboarding, feedback, appraisals, and team reflections
Priorities, owners, communication steps, HR connections and method of ongoing evaluation
The process may end with a proposal, continue with a pilot, or include support for the entire first cycle. Each subsequent phase will be agreed upon based on the objective, readiness, and available capacities.
We will obtain basic information for free. It does not produce any professional output.
We will clarify the reason, decisions, scope and groups involved in the process
We capture stories, experiences, strengths, tensions and informal rules
From specific situations, we lead groups to common principles and meanings
We will prepare values, behaviors, decision-making questions and a draft manifesto
We will verify the outputs and prepare a realistic communication and HR relationship plan.
The specific combination of modules is chosen according to the goal. Not every organization needs all parts to the same extent.
We understand the history, strategy, and reason for opening the topic.
Contains: interviews, background, objective, scope, participants and sensitive topics.
The process is based on real people's experiences.
Contains: stories, strengths, tensions, informal rules and cultural paradoxes.
We will prepare a format appropriate to the size and representation of the groups.
Contains: workshops, questions, interview rules, decision points and documentation.
We lead the discussion from specific situations to shared meanings.
Contains: moderation, group work, sorting of proposals and ongoing validation.
We will prepare a concise, authentic and understandable proposal.
Contains: names, definitions, explanations, manifesto and link to company identity.
Each value is given practical meaning.
Contains: positive expressions, boundaries, decision-making questions and examples of leader behavior.
Culture is anchored by repeated experiences and systems.
Contains: onboarding, appraisal, feedback, meetings, communication and development.
The outputs will be verified and translated into realistic steps.
Contains: comments, finalization, owners, priorities and control questions.
Maximum 30 minutes. It is intended to provide basic information and does not produce a professional output.
The paid block already includes the agreed professional work or output.
One-off workshops can create a quality foundation. However, anchoring values is only reflected in decisions, habits, leadership behaviors and HR processes.
Meetings at agreed intervals help keep attention on the topic without unnecessary pressure.
In new situations, it is easier to distinguish what is a continuation of the chosen direction and what is a return to the old pattern.
To a certain extent, a question, experience, or basis for further reflection can be captured between meetings.
The development of the topic, decisions, and open questions remain understandable even during a longer process.
The Pepax library is being built gradually as a professional knowledge base. A subscription can augment independent study, but it does not replace personal coaching or individual recommendations for a specific situation.
For someone who wants to work on the topic of personal development between meetings or independently.
- in-depth texts about values, decision-making, boundaries and career transitions,
- practical methodological sheets and reflection questions,
- case scenarios and work instructions,
- materials for independent study and ongoing evaluation.
Why it may be worth it: It helps you stay in touch with the topic at your own pace and be more prepared to make further decisions.
For professionals who work repeatedly with the topics of development, decision-making or coaching conversations.
- methodologies and decision-making frameworks,
- coaching objective and employment contract templates,
- checklists for interim and final evaluation,
- work issues, ethical boundaries and safe work frameworks.
Why it may be worth it: It reduces the need to build a working structure from scratch each time and promotes consistent professional practice.
Neither L2 nor L3 include individual consultations, review of a specific document, personal recommendations, workshops, coaching, mentoring, or work on a specific assignment.
Boundaries help distinguish a professional educational format from the promise that one event will automatically resolve a complex organizational or personal issue.
It can improve orientation, support and learning; leadership, role and work environment also influence the outcome.
Labor law, safety and regulatory areas are ensured by the relevant owners and qualified persons.
HR, managers, and guarantors provide context, background, and knowledge of real work.
Pepax will propose the path and evaluation; the employer is responsible for performance and work decisions.
Pepax combines facilitation and group dynamics with HR, organizational understanding, coaching and mentoring approaches, communication and process thinking. Values are not only considered as a text, but also as part of decision-making and personnel practice.
Objectives, content, forms of learning, practice and reflection.
Roles, processes, systems, data and work situations.
Responsibilities, competencies, milestones and further development.
Questions, transfer of experience, feedback and independence.
Materials and paths embedded in a maintainable system.
It is a guided process in which an organization names its identity, current culture, and the values it consciously wants to promote. The output can be a manifesto, behaviors, decision questions, rituals, and an anchoring plan.
Not always. Adequate representation of groups is important. Depending on the size of the organization, a combination of leadership, representative groups, interviews, workshops or broader validation can be used.
The duration depends on the size of the organization, the number of groups, the scope of mapping, workshops and outputs. A smaller process has several blocks, a larger facilitation takes place in several stages.
If it is part of the agreement, yes. However, the manifesto is not created as a universal text. It is based on real stories, discussions, and decision-making situations of the organization.
It can name reality, create a common language, and prepare an agreement. The change itself depends on management decisions, authority behavior, HR systems, and long-term consistency.
The initial interview lasts no more than 30 minutes and serves only to gain a basic understanding of the situation. It does not create a value proposition or professional output. The paid service includes preparation, facilitation, synthesis, and agreed materials.
The smallest professional block that already produces an agreed work or output. A broader program will be priced according to its scope.
Monthly support helps to use and improve the program. L2/L3 provide materials for independent work, not individual implementation.
The initial interview lasts no more than 30 minutes, is free of charge and serves to obtain basic information. It does not produce a professional output. After the interview, a proposal for an appropriate scope, procedure and outputs can be prepared.
© 2026 Pepax, sro – Company ID 34 129 278 – Company data and supervisory authority
We use essential cookies for the proper and secure functioning of the website. If optional cookies are active on the website, we will only use them with your consent. You can change your decision at any time in the cookie settings.